Feeding and water Flowering Vegetative
Nutrient burn, salt buildup and runoff pH
Burnt tips can suggest excess salts, but they aren't a diagnosis. Confirm with a consistent substrate test before changing feed or leaching, and never chase runoff pH with extreme-pH water.

On this page
When plants use water faster than they use fertilizer, salts concentrate in the medium. Leaf tips burn, and pH can swing.
Reading the signs
- Yellow or brown tips can come from excess salts, but also from other stresses. Check your measurements and recent changes.
- Marginal burn can indicate salt stress, but root problems, heat and nutrient deficiencies can look similar.
Reset the pot
- Confirm the problem first. Use a consistent extraction method that suits the medium, and compare with guidance for that method and your previous readings. Record input EC separately; a difference alone doesn’t prove toxic buildup.
- If excess substrate salts are confirmed in a well-drained, top-watered pot, follow a leaching procedure for that medium, using suitable low-salt water or nutrient solution. Don’t automatically pour one or two pot volumes through a waterlogged plant, a living-soil bed or a bottom-fed system. Let it drain and retest the same way.
- In coco, account for the base fertilizer, water composition and buffering state. Repeated plain-water leaching isn’t a substitute for a balanced program.
- Then go back to feeding at a lower strength.
About runoff pH
Runoff pH is often different from your input, and that’s normal. Ordinary runoff isn’t a standardized root-zone test. A 2025 hemp study found growth suppression below about pH 5.0 in peat-based substrate, but it didn’t establish one target for every medium. Confirm persistent shifts, check water alkalinity and fertilizer chemistry, and use corrections that suit your system instead of extreme-pH drenches.
Damage is permanent
Burnt tissue doesn’t turn green again. Judge recovery by new growth.
Sources (4)
- Purdue Extension. pH and electrical conductivity measurements in soilless substrates. HO-237-W. https://ag.purdue.edu/department/hla/extension/extension-publications-library/ext-pubs/ho-237-w.html [Evidence access: EXTENSION TEXT VERIFIED.]
- Veazie, P., Cockson, P., Smith, J. T., Schulker, B., Jackson, B., Hicks, K., & Whipker, B. (2025). Impact of substrate pH and micronutrient fertility rates on Cannabis sativa. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, 8, e70044. https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70044 [Evidence access: ABSTRACT VERIFIED; full-text access limited.]
- Cockson, P., Landis, H., Smith, T., Hicks, K., & Whipker, B. E. (2019). Characterization of nutrient disorders of Cannabis sativa. Applied Sciences, 9(20), 4432. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/9/20/4432 [Evidence access: FULL TEXT VERIFIED.]
- UMass Extension. Water quality: pH and alkalinity. https://ag.umass.edu/greenhouse-floriculture/fact-sheets/water-quality-ph-alkalinity [Evidence access: EXTENSION TEXT VERIFIED.]